Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

UROP Alumni Group Website

Saturday, August 9th, 2008

So, the reason for the lack of updates lately has been the development and launch of the UROP Alumni Group website last month. UROP, the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program, aims to give students of biology, maths, engineering and physics a chance to work in biomedical research. There are many such programs across the world, the earliest at MIT. This particular program is run by Bio21 Australia, for Victorian university students. I’m hoping this website will give past, present and prospective participants a chance to share their experiences, and learn about different opportunities across institutions

I would never have had the opportunity to undertake a PhD in hearing research if it weren’t for UROP, so I owe them greatly.

Back online…

Saturday, August 2nd, 2008

…after a disastrous upgrade to Wordpress 2.6. My old theme doesn’t work, so it will have to modified before everything is back to the way it was.

Velorock

Friday, May 16th, 2008

On March 29th this year, Velorock was held at the Brunswick Velodrome. It was easily the most fun music event I’d ever attended. The terrific bands. The bake sale. The people, young and old, but all thoroughly pleasant. The fact that everything — equipment and performers — were transported by bike and trailer. And it was free! That juggernaut festivals can get away with charging over $100, replete with corporate sponsorship, well, it kills me. It was a lovely day out. Hopefully the organizers broke even, and it will be back again next year.

Preparing for trailer races around the velodrome. Note Tali, of Lucksmiths fame, strapped securely in the toddler trailer.

Any injuries sustained didn’t seem to impede his subsequent performance.

More Flickr photos…

A Cat Playing The Theremin

Tuesday, April 15th, 2008

This is just too perfect.

(Via BB)

Latest in nerdy apparel

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

R2D2 Beanie…

And, the Utili-Kilt.

Maximum respect for anyone able to wear either (or both!) of these in public.

Musical hallucinations following deafness

Sunday, February 24th, 2008

It is relatively common to experience auditory hallucinations following hearing loss. It has been suggested that these hallucinations are the result of a ‘release’ of inhibition, normally provided by auditory experience. This inhibition would act to balance the reciprocal activity between high- and low-level processing centers, which both transfer basic sensory information, as well as “fill in the gaps” to provide a cohesive auditory experience. When the former high-level centers are in overdrive, however, the effect may be to trigger complex auditory percepts, without a driving auditory stimulus.

Oliver Sacks describes this phenomenon, along with an (as usual) gorgeously written account of the “Power of music” in the journal Brain (Sacks, 2006 - free!), an excerpt of which is included below. An interesting aspect of the above hypothesis is that we may expect these hallucinations to disappear if afferent drive (auditory input) is restored, for instance, via a cochlear implant. This does not appear to be the case. This is described in more detail by Sacks in this NPR Story, and in his recent book, Musicophilia.

Our auditory systems, our nervous systems, are tuned for music. Perhaps we are a musical species no less than a linguistic one. But there seems to be in us a peculiar sensitivity to music, a sensitivity that can all too easily slip out of control, become excessive, become a susceptibility or a vulnerability. Too-muchness lies continually in wait, whether this takes the form of ‘earworms’, musical hallucinations, swoons and trances, or music-induced seizures. This is the other side of the otherwise wonderful power of music. How much this is due to the intrinsic characteristics of music itself—its complex sonic patterns woven in time, its logic, its momentum, its unbreakable sequences, its insistent rhythms and repetitions, the mysterious way in which it embodies emotion and ‘will’—and how much to special resonances, synchronizations, oscillations, mutual excitations, feedbacks, and so forth, in the immensely complex, multi-level neural circuitry that subserves musical perception and replay, we do not know. We do not even know why, for instance, simple stroboscopic light displays can excite hallucinations, myoclonus and seizures, and this is an infinitely simpler matter than the powers of music.

When Crichtley and Henson’s Music and the Brain was published in 1977, functional brain imaging still lay in the future, and neuroscience had yet to approach the neural correlates of musical perception, imagery and memory or their disorders. In the last 20 years, there have been huge advances here, but we have, as yet, scarcely touched the question of why music, for better or worse, has so much power. It is a question that goes to the heart of being human.

Latest television obsession

Thursday, February 7th, 2008

While on vacation recently, I had the pleasure of experiencing the discombobulating experience that is North American cable television. Amongst a sea of, well, crap, there are some absolute gems that haven’t yet made it to Australian shores. An example is Flight of the Conchords*. And then there is my favorite, Ace of Cakes. It concerns a cake shop in Baltimore, and it’s obscenely talented staff. The whole process - a deft mix of sugar & civil engineering - is fascinating. Duff Goldman and his staff at Charm City Cakes are thoroughly pleasant (in stark contrast to every other reality show, ever), and obviously enjoy what they do.

It’s nice to know that such a sincere television show can still be made.

*New Zealand’s fourth most popular digi-folk parodists

The Neurobiology of Morals

Thursday, January 17th, 2008

Steven Pinker was kind enough to publish a lovely introduction to the biological basis of morals, from discussion of evolutionary and philosophical foundations, to the analogy of the visual illusion in forming quirks in moral reasoning such as the following…

On your morning walk, you see a trolley car hurtling down the track, the conductor slumped over the controls. In the path of the trolley are five men working on the track, oblivious to the danger. You are standing at a fork in the track and can pull a lever that will divert the trolley onto a spur, saving the five men. Unfortunately, the trolley would then run over a single worker who is laboring on the spur. Is it permissible to throw the switch, killing one man to save five? Almost everyone says “yes.”

Consider now a different scene. You are on a bridge overlooking the tracks and have spotted the runaway trolley bearing down on the five workers. Now the only way to stop the trolley is to throw a heavy object in its path. And the only heavy object within reach is a fat man standing next to you. Should you throw the man off the bridge? Both dilemmas present you with the option of sacrificing one life to save five, and so, by the utilitarian standard of what would result in the greatest good for the greatest number, the two dilemmas are morally equivalent. But most people don’t see it that way: though they would pull the switch in the first dilemma, they would not heave the fat man in the second.

Link (NY Times)

Living the dream

Saturday, December 22nd, 2007

Randall Munroe, proprietor of the charming webcomic xkcd, selected a rather unusual piece of lounge room furniture recently.

Downtime

Thursday, October 4th, 2007

My apologies for letting deadpopstar.com regress three years - some clumsy oaf has been messing with the server defaults. Similarly, I apologize for the lack of updates. I never really believed people read this blog, but since going on hiatus, visits have halved. So, I guess they do.

If you’d like to see what I’ve been working on, you might like to visit Wilson Hall at the University of Melbourne on October 24th, where my work will be unleashed upon the unsuspecting public. It forms part of the “Endeavour” exhibition, and runs from 11:30am til 4pm.